California

  Aviation Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
February 06, 2012
Aviation
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Aviation News

 

Meacham Field Aviation Mechanics Indicted

United States Attorney Jane J. Boyle announced that a federal grand jury returned a 36-count indictment yesterday charging fifteen aviation mechanics with various felony offenses related to making false statements and using false and fraudulent identification documents. Most of the defendants were initially detained on June 28, 2002 at their place of employment, Spirit Aviation Services, Meacham Field, Fort Worth, Texas.

The indictment alleges that all of the defendants worked as aircraft mechanics at Spirit Aviation Services, a wholly owned subsidiary of Spirit Airlines. Spirit Airlines is a commercial air carrier with corporate offices in Miramar, Florida. When the defendants applied for jobs, some of the defendants were screened and hired directly by Spirit Aviation. However, pre-employment screening for many of the defendants was provided by Sharp Aviation of Murfreesboro, Tennessee. Sharp Aviation provided independent contract employees to Spirit Aviation.

The indictment further charges that all of the defendants were required to complete several forms and provide various forms of personal identification as part of the employment screening process. Some of the defendants were screened and then hired directly by Spirit Aviation Services, but most were screened by Sharp Aviation and then provided as contract employees to Spirit Aviation Services.

The indictment further alleges that the defendants made false statements and used false documents in order to fraudulently gain employment as aircraft mechanics at Spirit Aviation Services. In particular, all 15 defendants made false statements when they completed their employment eligibility verification forms by falsely claiming to be either lawful permanent resident aliens or citizens or nationals of the United States.

As part of the employment screening process, the defendants were required to provide several different types of personal identification. The indictment further charges that these defendants used several fraudulent personal identification documents as part of their ongoing effort to secure employment at Spirit Aviation Services. According to the indictment, the defendants committed several different felony offenses in order to secure employment. These offenses included: the possession and use of false and fraudulent resident alien registration cards; the alteration of social security cards; falsely representing that a social security number was assigned to them; providing false information to obtain a social security account number; and falsely claiming to be a citizen or national of the United States.

Each of these defendants is charged with from one to four felony charges related to the use of fraudulent immigration and personal identification documents. Depending on the charges pending against each defendant, the maximum range of punishment for each defendant ranges from five years imprisonment and/or a $250,000 fine to 25 years imprisonment and/or a $1 million fine. Arraignment for all defendants is tentatively scheduled before United States Magistrate Judge Charles Bleil at the federal courthouse in Fort Worth on July 31, 2002.

Spirit Aviation and Sharp Aviation have been fully cooperative with law enforcement officials from the onset of the investigation. This case resulted from the joint investigative efforts of the United States Border Patrol, the Social Security Administration, and the North Texas Joint Terrorism Task Force. Assistant United States Attorney David Jarvis is the prosecuting attorney.

Are you seeking legal information regarding California aviation laws? If so, contact our expert California aviation attorneys today!

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Commercial pilots must be at least 18 years old and have a minimum of 250 hours of flight time
190 hours under Part 141, including 100 hours in powered aircraft, 50 hours in airplanes, 100 hours as pilot in command (of which 50 hours must be cross-country flight time). They must hold an instrument rating (or be restricted to flying for hire only in daylight, under visual flight rules, within 50 miles of the originating airport). They may fly for hire in accordance with applicable parts of the Federal Aviation Regulations.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Aviation cases in California and nationwide:

Statement By Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff Announcing A Change To The Nation's Threat Level For The Aviation Sector
Press OfficeU.S. Department of Homeland Security

August 10, 2006

The Department of Homeland Security is taking immediate steps...

Read more >


NTSB Marks 10Th Anniversary Of Crash Of TWA 800
Washington DC - With the 10th anniversary of the crash of TWA Flight 800 approaching, the National Transportation Safety Board today released a fac...
Read more >


More Aviation News >

 
 

Aviation Lawyers.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Tail Stall

Definition:
The horizontal stabilizer balances the tendency of the nose to pitch down by generating downward lift on the tail of the aircraft. When the tail stalls, this downward force is lessened or removed, and the nose of the airplane can severely pitch down.

Scud Running

Definition:
This occurs when a pilot tries to maintain visual contact with the terrain at low altitudes while instrument conditions exist.

Light

Definition:
The rate of accumulation may create a problem if flight is prolonged in this environment (over one hour).

More Aviation Lawyers.com Terms >

 

Aviation Law Resources

 


Search Aviation Law resources in our resource center:

More Aviation Resources >

 

Aviation Legal Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Aviation Law:

  • Small Plane Crash Icing
  • Pilot Errors & Negligence
  • Maintenance Problems
  • Violating FAA Regulations
  • Structural Design Problems

More Aviation Topics >

California Aviation Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Aviation attorney you should contact our Aviation Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Antioch
  • Bell
  • Hawthorne
  • Long Beach
  • Los Angeles
  • Norwalk
  • Oceanside
  • Pacoima
  • Santa Ana
  • South Gate
  • Norwalk
  • Oceanside
  • Oxnard
  • Pacoima
  • Pittsburg
  • Santa Ana
  • South Gate
  • Sylmar
  • Watsonville
  • Westminster
  • Fremont
  • Fresno
  • Hawthorne
  • Hayward
  • Hesperia
  • Huntington Beach
  • Huntington Park
  • Indio
  • La Habra
  • La Puente
  • Laguna Niguel
  • Lake Forest
  • Lancaster
  • Livermore
  • Long Beach
  • Los Angeles
  • Lynwood
  • Merced
  • Milpitas
  • Montebello
  • Moreno Valley
  • Napa
  • North Hollywood
  • Norwalk
  • Oceanside
  • Ontario
  • Oxnard
  • Pacoima
  • Palmdale
  • Panorama City
  • Pico Rivera
  • Pittsburg
  • Pomona
  • Porterville
  • Reseda
  • Rialto
  • Riverside
  • Rosemead
  • Sacramento
  • Salinas
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • San Jose
  • San Pedro
  • Santa Ana
  • Simi Valley
  • South Gate
  • South San Francisco
  • Sylmar
  • Tulare
  • Union City
  • Vacaville
  • Victorville
  • Vista
  • Watsonville
  • Westminster
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on California Aviation Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2012 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.